Hi,Hi
The standard flywheel weighs 4.6 kg
Tom
Clutch plates and pressure plate | 9.298 | S2: HT350 clutch model | 6.900 | 2.398 |
Fly Wheel | 4.990 | Custom Flywheel | 3.00 | 1.990 |
Hi,
Hmmm, Interesting, everywhere I've seen quotes, 4.9kg when new.
Either way 1.6 or 1.9 kg is a lot of weight to lose from, just, the flywheel.
Hi,Hi
Unfortunately the batteries of my large scale are empty and I can only weigh with mechanical scales. ( very unprecise ) The standard coupling weighs 7.6-7.8 kg and due to the construction I don't see much reduction.
I see the reduction on the flywheel as dangerous, as it loses strength and the balancing of all rotating parts has to be even more precise. We're talking about 8500 rpm.
Exact balancing to zero always means that the clutch and the flywheel are positioned when both parts are balanced to zero. If both parts are not installed in position, so
the balancing does not match to zero.
As a result, the flywheel can break at high speeds.
Tom
Clutch plates and pressure plate | 8.570 | HT350 clutch model | 6.900 | 1.670 | -19% |
Fly Wheel | 4.990 | Custom Flywheel | 3.000 | 1.990 | -40% |
Hi
Unfortunately the batteries of my large scale are empty and I can only weigh with mechanical scales. ( very unprecise ) The standard coupling weighs 7.6-7.8 kg and due to the construction I don't see much reduction.
I see the reduction on the flywheel as dangerous, as it loses strength and the balancing of all rotating parts has to be even more precise. We're talking about 8500 rpm.
Exact balancing to zero always means that the clutch and the flywheel are positioned when both parts are balanced to zero. If both parts are not installed in position, so
the balancing does not match to zero.
As a result, the flywheel can break at high speeds.
Just wondering where the clutch balancing holes are. The original coupling has holes (in the green circle), but your coupling does not.
View attachment 261833
Tom
Hi Tom,Hi
Unfortunately the batteries of my large scale are empty and I can only weigh with mechanical scales. ( very unprecise ) The standard coupling weighs 7.6-7.8 kg and due to the construction I don't see much reduction.
I see the reduction on the flywheel as dangerous, as it loses strength and the balancing of all rotating parts has to be even more precise. We're talking about 8500 rpm.
Exact balancing to zero always means that the clutch and the flywheel are positioned when both parts are balanced to zero. If both parts are not installed in position, so
the balancing does not match to zero.
As a result, the flywheel can break at high speeds.
Just wondering where the clutch balancing holes are. The original coupling has holes (in the green circle), but your coupling does not.
View attachment 261833
Tom
Is there a difference between the V10 and the V8 clutch pack, the V8 comes in at 8.17kg, new, on euspares.co.uk, which might bring it closer to the weight of your used unit.Hi
Weight clutch and clutch with flywheel ( 4,5Kg alone )
View attachment 261870
View attachment 261871
Tom
Sorry, I was a bit slow with editing... No flywheel.I assume that weight includes the flywheel?
That is a good saving particularly from rotational mass.Crank 24.940 PPM 5.2 23.700 Saved 1.240 kg
Clutch plates and pressure plate 8.140 HT350 clutch model 6.900 Saved 1.240 kg
Fly Wheel 4.990 HT350 clutch model 3.000 Saved 1.990 kg
8 Harmonic Damper Bolts 0.126 Titanium 0.074 Saved 0.052 kg
9 Clutch Flywheel Bolt 0.180 Titanium Bolts 0.086 Saved 0.095 kg
Total saving: 4.616 kg
+ the savings from, CCB's, Wheel nuts, hub bolts and nuts, drive shaft bolts, cams, cam bolts, valves, valve springs, valve retainers, rods and pistons saved a total of (moving/rotating parts) 21.902 kg.
I'm hoping it will make a big difference, especially when combined with the total current (calculated) weight loss being 109.194 kg less than when I started. I think there is another kg to be found without carving up the car. Not to mention the final predicted jump in hp.That is a good saving particularly from rotational mass.