Ha,
the good old polarizing topic...
You see, the problem, is as in politics. It doesn't specifically rely on the matter. It's us humans, it's how we perceive something, read and acknowledge something and how we act upon it. We may have different opinions based on our experiences and beliefs and be totally entitled to stand by them. But to be blind folded is another matter (and quite dangerous at it).
What is your assessment of "better"? Most of the time is "faster", "seamless". What is wrong with classifying it as "rawer"? Is an Apple Watch
better than a Patek Philippe? Because it's connected? Because it's more accurate? Well, if all you care is that, then it is! But to negate the virtues of the ancient Patek movement and it's manufacture would be downright dumb on anyone's part. And there are quite a few people that like old, jurassic horology.
The way I see it:
- Manual: provides you the analog feel, the biggest bound with the vehicle. You engage on more levels, heightening the sensorial experience. You can try to shift faster, smoother, from 5th to 2nd at your pleasure.. No one cares that it's the slower transmission and everyone forgives that. Never seen anyone complain.
- S-Tronic: Pinacle of race-derived technology, faster, smoother, etc. Like clock-work. Amazing feat. Up, down, left, right, mid-range, red-line, never missing a beat. Truly spectacular.
- R-Tronic: The wors... hold on... not quite; some people actually enjoy the
flawed transmission! Down shifts are thrilling. Up shifts thump you in the back, especially at WOT. Factory programmed to be slower at lower engine rpm and as fast as possible when driving spiritually. Is it jerky sometimes? Yeah! Clumsy-even in Auto mode? Touché. Does it rock you forward and back? Yes... if you don't modulate your throttle input. Same as with a manual transmission (if you want) by the way. Brings old supercar sensations, vibrations and whatnot.
To keep the post shorter, I'd like to just simply say that some may like the imperfect and raw R-Tronic experience. It's available everywhere, with more interior/exterior combinations and cheaper as well. Does this mean all R-Tronic buyers get it because they're cheapskates? What if they get the experience they are looking for? I, for one, don't think DCTs engaging. Effective? Sure. But not my cup of tea. BUT, I respect and UNDERSTAND why would anyone get a S-Tronic and don't feel the need to say how lifeless (IMO) they are over and over again. Specially if your are tracking your car and drag racing, or simply want a peaceful cruise, the S-Tronic is much refined and faster!
At the end of the day, each R-Tronic buyer leaves more S-Tronic models for you all! Double bonus!
So, what is your definition of "better"? And by the way, maybe a Tesla is "better"... just sayin'
